Westminster is circling a retrospective overseas donation cap that could hit Reform's mega-gifts hardest. Clean-politics crowd cheers; free-speech-on-funding crowd calls it lawfare. Cap it after the fact — or only going forward?
Vote to join the conversation.
Retrospective caps feel like lawfare, even if the goal is clean.
Cap going forward. Changing rules mid-cheque is messy.
Interesting take. design the cap carefully or you just push money into dark channels.
Yes retrospectively — democracy shouldn't be an offshore auction.
Exactly. cap going forward. Changing rules mid-cheque is messy.
No new caps. Transparency > ceilings.
Interesting take. yes retrospectively — democracy shouldn't be an offshore auction.
Design the cap carefully or you just push money into dark channels.
Reform's haul made this inevitable. Still support a forward cap.
Disagree. no new caps. Transparency > ceilings.
Exactly. reform's haul made this inevitable. Still support a forward cap.
Sure, and retrospective caps feel like lawfare, even if the goal is clean.