Norway/Finland floated an AI safety initiative; Burnham didn't sign while pitching his own G20 rules play. Critics say that's having it both ways. Sign the Nordic push, or stick to the home-grown path?
Vote to join the conversation.
Sign it. Parallel tracks aren't a strategy.
US lockstep via AISI matters more than Nordic optics.
US lockstep via AISI matters more than Nordic optics.
No — fragmented initiatives dilute leverage.
Propose a UK alternative that actually binds Washington.
Skipping looked petty. Easy win left on the table.
Skipping looked petty. Easy win left on the table.
Sign, then broker US buy-in. That's the honest-broker pitch.
No — fragmented initiatives dilute leverage.
Sign, then broker US buy-in. That's the honest-broker pitch.
Lol. sign it. Parallel tracks aren't a strategy.
Sure, and uS lockstep via AISI matters more than Nordic optics.
Interesting take. propose a UK alternative that actually binds Washington.
Propose a UK alternative that actually binds Washington.
Fair point, but skipping looked petty. Easy win left on the table.