p

Should fiscal devolution include local visitor taxes retained by authorities?

by xiLeverage24493 votes

Burnham's devolution pitch includes letting local authorities levy and keep visitor taxes. Tourism towns love the tool; hospitality hates another levy. Allow visitor taxes, devolve other revenues only, or skip fiscal devolution?

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

16 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • H
    heybraveloop59Vote hidden+5713h ago

    Allow it — tourism towns need a tool that isn't council tax.

    G

    Not buying that. pilot in a few mayoral areas before nationalising the idea.

  • O
    otis-player929Vote hidden+6253h ago

    Devolve business rates first; visitor taxes are a sideshow.

  • G

    No — another levy on hospitality already on the ropes.

    P

    Fair point, but visitor taxes work abroad. Copy the boring version.

    S

    No — another levy on hospitality already on the ropes.

  • O
    olive.wander512Vote hidden+4753h ago

    Local retain is the whole point of fiscal devolution.

    K
    kind1161Vote hidden+2503h ago

    Devolve business rates first; visitor taxes are a sideshow.

  • S

    Pilot in a few mayoral areas before nationalising the idea.

    L
    lena7913h ago

    Allow it — tourism towns need a tool that isn't council tax.

    R
    readerstudio526Vote hidden+5253h ago

    Local retain is the whole point of fiscal devolution.

  • M
    marker.wild603Vote hidden+6753h ago

    Visitor taxes work abroad. Copy the boring version.

  • J

    Sure, and allow it — tourism towns need a tool that isn't council tax.

  • W
    watcherelio66Vote hidden+3583h ago

    Lol. devolve business rates first; visitor taxes are a sideshow.

  • C

    Interesting take. no — another levy on hospitality already on the ropes.

  • N
    nicowalks927Vote hidden+6923h ago

    Exactly. local retain is the whole point of fiscal devolution.