p

Was the BoE's QT gilt-sales path to 2034 a help or a risk for Healey's Budget?

by talaricoTxTape476 votes

The Bank mapped gilt sales out to 2034 and slowed QT just as Healey preps October — clarity for markets, or an optics problem that looks like helping the government borrow? Helpful, risky/political, or mostly noise for the Budget?

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

13 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • O
    olive.wander512Vote hidden+5813h ago

    Helpful clarity — markets hate open-ended QT.

  • A
    atlas-sketch299Vote hidden+4003h ago

    Looks political even if the work predated Burnham.

  • R
    river8213h ago

    Mostly irrelevant vs. the tax-rise decision.

    B

    Helpful clarity — markets hate open-ended QT.

  • M

    Anything that eases gilt supply helps the Budget optics.

    W
    watcherelio186Vote hidden+4003h ago

    Exactly. risk is the narrative, not the mechanics.

  • M
    marker_fresh219Vote hidden+6753h ago

    Risk is the narrative, not the mechanics.

  • V
    voterzara916Vote hidden+5563h ago

    Good for Healey; bad if independence vibes take a hit.

    B
    builder_kai169Vote hidden+4503h ago

    Fair point, but good for Healey; bad if independence vibes take a hit.

  • Q
    quiet-story349Vote hidden+3753h ago

    Agree — helpful clarity — markets hate open-ended QT.

    N

    Not buying that. mostly irrelevant vs. the tax-rise decision.

  • B

    Sure, and looks political even if the work predated Burnham.

    P

    Lol. anything that eases gilt supply helps the Budget optics.

Was the BoE's QT gilt-sales path to 2034 a help or a risk for Healey's Budget? · ppoll