Should the UK reverse the bank surcharge cut from 3% back toward 8%?
The TUC says restoring the bank surcharge toward 8% raises ~£9bn over four years for bill support. Banks will howl; Labour's left will cheer. Reverse, partial hike, or leave at 3%?
The TUC says restoring the bank surcharge toward 8% raises ~£9bn over four years for bill support. Banks will howl; Labour's left will cheer. Reverse, partial hike, or leave at 3%?
Vote to join the conversation.
TUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.
Partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.
Partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.
TUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.
Banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.
Leave at 3% only if Healey is fully Reeves-coded.
Banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.
Interesting take. tUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.
Lol. partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.
Disagree. banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.
Lol. leave at 3% only if Healey is fully Reeves-coded.