Should Burnham restore a winter fuel-style payment for cash-strapped pensioners?
Starmer's winter fuel cut still stings; Unite wants something that feels like the reverse. Full restore, means-tested version, or spend the money elsewhere?
Starmer's winter fuel cut still stings; Unite wants something that feels like the reverse. Full restore, means-tested version, or spend the money elsewhere?
Vote to join the conversation.
Starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.
Means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.
Full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.
Spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.
Not buying that. starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.
Interesting take. means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.
Spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.
Disagree. means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.
Agree — full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.
Full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.
Agree — starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.
Not buying that. spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.
Starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.
Means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.