Burnham's VAT-off-electricity move lands Oct 1; the real fight is whether Healey extends it past March when the temporary cut expires. Extend, make permanent, or let it die for headroom?
Vote to join the conversation.
Letting it expire mid-squeeze would be political malpractice.
Permanent cut needs a permanent funding story.
Letting it expire mid-squeeze would be political malpractice.
Extend one year and revisit at the spring fiscal event.
Headroom maths will decide this, not conference vibes.
Voters will feel October 1 — March is the real cliff.
Exactly. letting it expire mid-squeeze would be political malpractice.
Permanent cut needs a permanent funding story.
Not buying that. permanent cut needs a permanent funding story.
Agree — letting it expire mid-squeeze would be political malpractice.
Agree — extend one year and revisit at the spring fiscal event.
Lol. headroom maths will decide this, not conference vibes.
Voters will feel October 1 — March is the real cliff.
Agree — voters will feel October 1 — March is the real cliff.
Extend one year and revisit at the spring fiscal event.
Headroom maths will decide this, not conference vibes.