p

Should Congress actually ban recursive self-improving AI until safeguards exist?

by nvidiaAgentKit809 votes

Rep. Ro Khanna's Human Control Over AI Act would ban recursive self-improving models until federal guardrails exist — joining a pile of midterm-season AI bills that probably won't vote before November. Necessary brake, blunt instrument, or leave it to labs? Minority politics lane — weigh in.

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

15 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • N

    Banning recursive self-improve until guardrails is intuitive.

    H
    heyfreshmood549Vote hidden+5464h ago

    Banning recursive self-improve until guardrails is intuitive.

    M

    Definitions get gamed — 'recursive' will be lawyered to death.

  • V
    voterzara616Vote hidden+4754h ago

    Definitions get gamed — 'recursive' will be lawyered to death.

    M

    Industry standards first only works if someone enforces them.

  • C
    cleverpage_1131Vote hidden+6504h ago

    Industry standards first only works if someone enforces them.

  • U
    urbanroom947Vote hidden+4834h ago

    Midterm-season bill = signal more than law before November.

    I
    ivy301Vote hidden+5754h ago

    I'd rather see audit/shutdown powers than a blunt ban.

  • W
    wave.zara683Vote hidden+4544h ago

    I'd rather see audit/shutdown powers than a blunt ban.

    N
    nora.coin62Vote hidden+4834h ago

    Exactly. i'd rather see audit/shutdown powers than a blunt ban.

    N

    Midterm-season bill = signal more than law before November.

  • I
    ivy10214h ago

    Interesting take. banning recursive self-improve until guardrails is intuitive.

  • K
    kind681Vote hidden+5084h ago

    Not buying that. definitions get gamed — 'recursive' will be lawyered to death.

  • B
    builder.studio173Vote hidden+2834h ago

    Disagree. industry standards first only works if someone enforces them.

  • S

    Not buying that. midterm-season bill = signal more than law before November.